CORD Newsletter

Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors
May, 1998

CORD Meeting Agenda May 18

12:30 - 1:30 pm CORD Business Meeting

  1. Introduction of new program, Marcus Martin, MD
  2. President's Address, Marcus Martin, MD
  3. Secretary/Treasurer's Report, Dan Savitt, MD
  4. Election - Board of Director member
  5. Award Presentations
  6. ABEM Report
  7. RRC-EM Report
  8. ERAS Report, Pam Dyne, MD
1:30 - 2:45 pm The Structured Interview 2:45 - 3:00 pm Break

3:00 - 3:45 pm Roundtable Discussion

3:45 - 5:00 pm ACGME Strategic Initiative, Dr. David C. Leach, Executive Director ACGME

New Program Directors' Workshop

CORD will sponsor a new program directors orientation workshop again this year in conjunction with the SAEM meeting in May. This will be held on Monday, May 18 from 8:00 am - 12:00 noon in the and is free to all CORD members, although it is geared to those program directors who have been in their position for 3 years or less and assistant program directors. The agenda is below. Please let the CORD office know if you will be attending to ensure that there are enough handouts.

8:00 - 9:00 am Living by the Program Requirements - RRC-EM
Larry Sulton, PhD and Joe Clinton, MD
9:00 - 9:30 am The Nuts and Bolts of Resident Remediation
Carey Chisholm, MD
9:30 - 10:30 am Motivating and Mentoring Residents - panel discussion
Glenn Hamilton, MD, Rita Cydulka, MD, Tiffany Medlin, MD
10:30 - 11:15 am ABEM Issues and Procedures
Dan Danzl, MD and ABEM staff
11:15 - 12:00 noon Conflict Negotiation and Resolution
Louis Binder, MD

President's Message "Update of the Cord Task Force and Committee Activities for 1997-98"

I am taking this opportunity through the President's Message to summarize CORD committees and task forces activities for 1997-1998. Committees and task forces have been quite active this past year. First of all, I would like to thank each committee chair and member for its dedication to CORD.

Some of the committees and task forces will be carried over to 1999 to complete their objectives. Some task forces will be dissolved as their objectives have been completed. There will be some changes in membership on committees and there will possibly be the establishment of new task forces. Any CORD member interested in participating in committees and task forces, please contact me to let me know of your interest prior to or during the CORD meeting.

The Faculty Development and New Program Director Orientation Committee has an outstanding New Program Directors Workshop scheduled May 18, 8:00 a.m.-12 noon. This orientation workshop is free to CORD members and is geared to program directors 3 years or less in the position as well as assistant program directors. The Faculty Development course for 1997 did not have as many registrants as the previous years' course due to location and competing courses. Nonetheless, the course was felt to be successful and was of high quality. The board of directors decided to continue the faculty development course due to the success and quality but to look very closely at the location for the upcoming year. The location for the 1998 course will be announced after the SAEM meeting.

The SLOR Task Force revised the SLOR this past year and has received input from the membership on suggestions for revisions. SLOR continues to be viewed as a valuable tool for program directors to assess applicants.

The Program Directors Monograph Task Force has been busy and will complete their objective of producing a monograph for program directors by the SAEM meeting. The monograph will contain information regarding timelines (cyclical deadlines) commonly called upon organizations, job descriptions and other useful information for program directors. The CORD Board of Directors will review and subsequently anticipate approving the monograph project distribution to the membership. The Electronic Residency Match Task Force monitored ERAS activity this year. It has been a tremendous asset to CORD in bringing about a very successful year involvement of emergency medicine in ERAS.

The Nominating Committee fulfilled its objective of nominating CORD members for board election and they have selected the recipients for the CORD residents and faculty award. Members who are standing for election and the CORD awardees are featured in this newsletter.

The EKG Bank Subcommittee of the Curriculum Committee has developed an EKG teaching file for program directors that is electronic, interpretation linked and case linked. The proceedings of the EKG Subcommittee will be on display at the SAEM meeting.

The Bylaws Committee reviewed and recommended revisions to the Bylaws for the May, 1998 CORD meeting. Specifically, the Bylaws committee reviewed participation by non members and the process of appointment versus election to fill unexpired terms. The Bylaws Committee proposed recommendations for revisions for 1998 are outlined in this newsletter.

Dr. Joseph LaMantia, one of the two CORD CAS-AAMC representatives, attended the CAS Spring meeting. Joe reports that the consistent theme during the CAS meeting was the need to develop new structure processes in the academic medical center to meet the challenges both from within and outside academic medicine. From the perspective of the emergency medicine program director several issues have particular relevance and importance. Please see Dr. LaMantia's report in this issue of the Newsletter.

The CPC Task Force has organized the annual Regional CPC Competition which will occur on May 16 in Chicago. 50 programs will be participating and details are included in this Newsletter.

Sam Keim, MD, and Carey Chisholm, MD, served as the CORD representatives on the Core Content Task Force in the past year. They have prepared an update which is included in this Newsletter.

The Organization of Resident Representatives (ORR) have done a find job. An outstanding report submitted by Rebecca Parker appeared in the last issue of the Newsletter.

The Program Committee has done an outstanding job in arranging the 1997-98 CORD programs. An outline of the CORD Meeting which will be held on May 18 is included in this Newsletter. I look forward to seeing you in Chicago.

Marcus Martin, MD
University of Virginia

Match Update from the University of Illinois

As many of you are aware, this year's match was altered by an unfortunate chain of events which involved the University of Illinois Emergency Medicine residency program. Due to a clerical error, the residency was over booked by 18 positions. The number of positions reported to the NRMP was 36 (the size of the entire residency) instead of the correct 12 position quota. The error went undetected until Monday, March 16 (48 hours before Match Day) when the UIC Emergency Medicine residency was informed that they had matched 30 new residents with six unmatched positions. In the 20 year history of the program, this was the first time it had been listed as "unmatched." The residency program staff labored feverishly in an attempt to remedy the situation once the match officials stated they were unwilling to re-run the match.

On March 16, the NRMP placed some of the students who had listed other programs on their rank list into these programs if positions were available. The UIC residency program then worked on placing the remaining students into other EM programs which had unfilled positions or were willing to increase their quota of first year positions. Following immediate/temporary approval from the RRC, UIC expanded its EM residency to accommodate two extra positions in the straight three year program and one extra position in the combined IM/EM program to place the overmatched applicants. Obviously, the program could not take all 30 applicants.

The UIC EM residency has done everything possible to help accommodate these applicants. As of Match Day, (March 18), 17 of the 18 applicants were placed in other residency programs. The remaining student has several options and will soon be properly placed. The UIC staff extends its thanks to those programs who were willing to assist during a very trying time. We are extremely apologetic for any "ripple effect" this over booking may have caused in other residency programs. At no time was there calculated ill-will or competitive motives to "scoop" top notch applicants away from other residencies.

The lesson we learned was the necessity to tighten the lines of communication with the National Resident Matching Program. This mistake occurred and was propagated all too easily and a more advanced, "fail-safe" system is needed since repercussions of mistakes are great. The UIC EM residency hopes that we can work together to assure this never happen again, to any program.

Jackie Strange
EM Residency Coordinator
University of Illinois, Chicago

Award Recipients Announced The Nominating Committee is please to announce the recipients of the CORD Awards which will be presented during the CORD Business Meeting on Monday, May 18 between 12:30 and 1:30 pm.

CORD Resident Academic Achievement Award

CORD is pleased to announce the selection of Stephen W. Burgher, MD as this year's winner of the CORD Resident Academic Achievement Award. This award recognizes a resident who has demonstrated great potential as a future academic faculty member. Dr. Burgher is currently chief resident in the Portsmouth Naval Medical Center, Emergency Medicine Residency Program. He has been instrumental in developing and implementing two original research projects during his residency, both resulting in regional and national presentations; published abstracts; and manuscripts submitted to emergency medicine journals. He teaches Pediatric Advanced Life Support, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Advanced Trauma Life Support, and is authoring a chapter for Emergency Medicine Clinics in North America. He also has developed the program's computer-generated residency logo which won first place at the 1997 SAEM Annual Meeting Photography Competition.

Kevin J. Knoop, MD, Program Director of the Naval Medical Center Emergency Medicine Residency, offered these comments about Dr. Burgher in his nomination letter: "Dr. Burgher has demonstrated all the facets of an outstanding future academic faculty member during his residency. He has been at the top of this class clinically and academically from day one. Formal monthly evaluations from faculty and rotating interns have consistently documented his avid teaching and superb clinical skills. Each of his emergency medicine conference lectures has been rated as outstanding by attending staff...Dr. Burgher's academic enthusiasm and productivity as a resident has truly been impressive. He has gone above and beyond in his efforts to learn and practice academic emergency medicine. His hard work and leadership have directly benefited his fellow residents and set the stage for future residents to follow in his footsteps. His accomplishments have brought great credit upon himself and upon our young program. I can think of no one more deserving to receive this prestigious award recognizing resident academic achievement."

CORD Faculty Teaching Award

CORD is pleased to announce the selection of Gregory W. Hendey, MD, as this year's winner of the CORD Faculty Teaching Award. The award recognizes the contributions of a junior faculty member to the education of emergency medicine residents. Dr. Hendey is Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco and is the Residency Director of the Emergency Medicine Residency Program at Valley Medical Center, Fresno, California. He co-directs the Department's Research Committee and is the Medical Director of the Air Ambulance Program and elective resident rotation.

Dr. Hendey completed his emergency medicine residency training at the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center and was the Chief Resident in his final year of training. He is a graduate of the ACEP Teaching Fellowship and has served on the ACEP Educational Meeting's Committee. He serves as a reviewer for the Annals of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Emergency Medicine, and Pediatrics. He is a member of CORD and participated in the development of the standardized medical student evaluation form. He is a past recipient of Valley Medical Center's Housestaff Faculty Teacher of the Year Award.

Herbert G. Bivins, MD, Emergency Medicine Program Director at Fresno, offered these comments about Dr. Hendey and his teaching in his nomination letter: "Dr. Hendey's fairness and dedication to the residents in EM resident education is unsurpassed. His conferences, which include a wide variety of topics, are well developed, delivered and received...His enthusiasm and leadership has led to increased resident participation and interest (in research)...There has not been a junior faculty member who has had a bigger impact on resident education in our residency program."

Slate of Nominees

During the May 18 CORD meeting an election will be held for the following position: one Board member-at-large (3 year term). The Nominating Committee has selected the following slate of nominees for the position and nominations from the floor will also be accepted.

Board Member-at-Large

Susan Dufel, MD, is Program Director of the Integrated Residency in Emergency Medicine at the University of Connecticut Health Center, and an Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine in the Department of Traumatology and Emergency Medicine. She graduated from Northwestern Medical School in 1980, completed an emergency medicine residency in 1983 at St. Vincent's Medical Center/Toledo Hospital, and completed a fellowship in administration in 1984 at EMS Miami Valley Hospital. Dr. Dufel is a member of the CORD Program Committee and served as an item writer and section editor for the CORD Question and Answer Bank in 1993 and 1998. She has been an ABEM Examiner since 1987 and a reviewer for Academic Emergency Medicine (1996-1998).

Joseph LaMantia, MD, is the Director of the Emergency Medicine Residency Program at North Shore University Hospital. Dr. LaMantia graduated from the State University of New York at Brooklyn Medical School in 1979 and completed an internal medicine residency in 1982 from Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. He has served as the Chair of the CORD Program Committee and as a member of the SAEM Geriatric Task Force, serving as chair of the task force (1997-1998). Dr. LaMantia served on the SAEM Education Committee (1989-1993), the Faculty Development Subcommittee of the SAEM Education Committee (1991-1993), and the SAEM National Consensus Group on Clinical Skills in Emergency Medicine Task Force (1993-1997) and served as the chair of the Task Force (1996-1997). Dr. LaMantia is an ABEM Oral Examiner and has served as a CORD Representative to the AAMC-CAS.

New Program Approved by RRC-EM

During the February meeting of the Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine, a 1,2,3 program was approved (8 residents per year). This brings the number of approved programs to 120. CORD congratulates this program!

Saginaw Cooperative Hospitals, Inc.
Robert W. Wolford, MD
Saginaw Cooperative Hospitals, Inc.
Emergency Medicine
1000 Houghton Avenue
Saginaw, MI 48609
Telephone: 517-771-6817
Fax: 517-754-2741
e-mail: rwolford@concentric.net

ECG Task Force Annual Report

Since our October meeting, the ECG Task Force has been busy setting-up the mechanics for ECG submission, storage and processing. An in-depth investigation and trial of the optimal search engine was the first priority. We did not want to solicit yet ECG submissions from the CORD membership. The interpretation, editing, and processing of such ECGs would have required considerable work that had a great risk of not being used due to incompatibility with the final electronic format. We have determined that the best search engine to browse optimally through the website, the links, and the Excel database, would be Cold Fusion. CORD members would be able to search quickly for specific needs that they would indicate. Cold fusion allows great flexibility accessing and filing the ECGs, scenarios, teaching points or multiple choice questions we plan to provide. Cold fusion will also allow us to keep track of users, to approve or deny access to users, and potentially to allow a user to log in and pick up where they last left off, if going through a preset series of cases.

The process we are setting up involves downloading electronic data for any specific ECG that a CORD member wishes to contribute unto a floppy. We would provide you with instructions on how to do that from heart stations at your individual institutions. Various Marquette editions are out there (over 6 we have identified so far). We have worked with Marquette and now can directly download ECG images from archives as digitized raw data. This digital data may be used to redraw the tracings at original resolution. The data for each individual ECG can be saved as 15k files onto floppies in any contributing institutions. They are then forwarded to us via e-mail as files or via post, and processed via programs secured unto an excel macro we are designing. Data would be transformed into Excel files that can be plotted using Java as an actual ECG on your screen.

The quality of the scan would be outstanding and homogeneous. No need for lengthy and faulty cleansing of ECG copies. We would also avoid the impact of grids and artifact on quality of the final product. We would no longer need to sacrifice the quality of what you view during scanning, compression and cleansing of paper ECG submissions. File size, search and downloading time would be small. CORD would then have a state-of-the-art educational program that has not been designed or conceived of by any other specialty. It would be one where quality and potential for development are tremendous. It would also be definitely easier to edit and maintain.

The links, clinical scenarios, and teaching points for each submission would be available, processed, and edited as demonstrated in October in San Francisco. The 3-frame format will still be used. Individual CORD contributors and their institution would be acknowledged on the text relevant to that ECG.

We are also working on a relational database, in Access, to store all of the ECGs and related clinical scenarios and teaching files. The database will make use of an exhaustive Excel spreadsheet of descriptions of ECG abnormalities which will be used to catalog each tracing. The access database is being designed to allow for storage of more than one set of teaching points for each ECG, so that we could have a basic set and more advanced sets to accommodate different levels of users (students, residents, paramedics).

The project could be done without Cold Fusion and the Access database, by simply coding all of the links between html pages. If we go that route, we loose a huge amount of flexibility and ease of updating and improving the collection of cases, not to mention some of the database search functions like retrieving all ECGs demonstrating a specific abnormality, heart rate, etc. We shall face two difficulties: 1) Institutions that do not utilize Marquette would be at least initially at a disadvantage in their ability to submit ECGs for the bank. 2) Many of our interesting ECGs that many of us have collected over the years would not be useful unless they can be located using [date + name and/or medical record] in our individual heart stations. On the other hand, we also found out that in theory any old ECGs can be retrieved and processed irrespective of the MUSE edition or year it was taken.

Finally, we are presenting the most recent version of the project as one of the Innovation in EM Education Exhibits at the SAEM Annual Meeting in Chicago. We hope to have an actual prototype ready to demonstrate the website in Chicago - using a laptop, a modem and basic software. We will use a limited number of ECGs in that demonstration. We plan to begin soliciting ECG submissions and designing clinical scenarios and teaching points after the meeting. We thank you for your support and welcome any comments or suggestions.

Antoine Kazzi, MD
University of California, Irvine

CPC Regional Competition

The annual CPC Regional Competition will be held on Saturday, May 16 in the Ohio, Mississippi, Colorado, and Erie rooms of the Sheraton Hotel in Chicago. Sixty-seven cases were submitted and 50 selected for presentation. Thanks are due to the 100 residents and faculty who will match wits in the presentation and discussion of interesting cases. This year the the CPC has been approved for 7 hours of category I credit. There is no registration fee to attend the CPC Competition and all CORD members are urged to attend and support the residency programs.

The regional coordinators and judges will evaluate the presentations and will select the Best Discussant and Best Presenter from each of the five competitions. These recipients will be announced during the CPC Reception which will be held at 5:30 pm-6:30 pm and will compete in the National CPC Competition at the ACEP Scientific Assembly in San Diego on October 13.

Bylaws Amendments

Each year the CORD Bylaws are reviewed for potential amendments which should be brought before the membership for consideration. On January 26, the CORD Board of Directors approved the amendments proposed by the Bylaws Committee. The following amendments are provided for the membership's consideration at the annual business meeting on May 18:

Article III, Section 3: Each full member and associate member program shall pay annual dues to the organization an amount to be determined by the Board of Directors. Member privileges will be suspended if dues are six months past due. Membership will terminate if dues are 12 months past due. Any program whose membership has been canceled for failure to pay dues shall lose all privileges of membership.

Article V, Section 6: A. Annual election of officers and members-at-large of the Board shall take place during the semiannual meeting that is held in conjunction with the SAEM meeting. The President shall appoint members to fill vacancies and unexpired terms on the Board of Directors until the next scheduled election.

Article XI: These bylaws may be altered and amended at any time in accordance with Article IV Section 4 of these Bylaws at any properly noticed meeting held for that purpose. proposed amendments shall be submitted in writing to the CORD office by any full member forty five (45) days prior to the meeting.

Council of Academic Societies Spring Meeting, March 26-29, 1998

Five plenary sessions were held:

  1. Report of the AAMC
  2. Issues in Medical School, Teaching Hospital and Department Organization
  3. Measuring and Promoting Organizational Success and Productivity
  4. Defining Scholarship in the Medical Environment
  5. The New Health Care Environment: Outside Perspectives
Consistent themes during the CAS meeting were the need to develop new structures and processes in the academic medical centers to meet the challenges both from within and outside academic medicine.

Specifically within academic medicine there is:

  1. the need for flexibility.
  2. the need for interaction among faculty within the department and within other departments of the institution.
  3. the need to align the mission of the department with that of the university.
  4. the need to establish research agenda that recognize new technologies, new approaches in problem solving, and that value the importance of an interdisciplinary approach in the sciences.
  5. a need to establish guidelines and measures for academic productivity.
  6. the need to recognize forms of scholarship other than that of research, namely scholarship whose purpose is to integrate, to apply, or to educate.
  7. the need to develop better assessment measures for these other types of scholarship.
  8. the need to expand the science of clinical outcomes, clinical decision making and the health of populations.
  9. the need to understand the agenda of the pharmaceutical and managed care industry and to discover and to work collaboratively in areas of converging interest.
From the perspective of the emergency medicine program director, several issues have particular relevance and importance:
  1. Program directors have an important role in the faculty development programs in their departments by participating in:
    1. setting the research agenda of the department that promotes the institutional, departmental and program mission and realizes the need for new paradigms and new approaches.
    2. developing ways to better measure productivity in all forms of scholarship.
    3. developing ways to promote faculty interaction that take advantage of specific skills and interests.
  2. Program directors must recognize the need to educate the residents to provide care that is consistent with the information that is available about clinical outcomes, clinical decision making and the health of populations.
  3. Program directors must teach the residents about the role and activities of pharmaceutical companies, managed care organizations and other related industries as it relates to patient care and quality outcomes, to promote collaboration on a clinical care and on a research level in areas of converging interests.
I would also like to point out the wealth and quality of the information that is available from the AAMC on issues of importance to graduate medical education and would recommend that program directors directly contact the AAMC or access their website at www.aamc.org as an additional source of information for program related concerns.

Joseph LaMantia, MD
CORD Representative to CAS/AAMC

Emergency Medicine Residency Coordinators' Forum

The inaugural Residency Coordinator's Forum will be held on May 18-19 in the Ohio Room of the Sheraton Hotel in Chicago. The goal is to provide information, networking opportunities and sharing of ideas between residency coordinators and the national organizations associated with academic emergency medicine. Topics will include presentations from the ABEM, RRC-EM and CORD; the Electronic Residency Application Service; recognizing the problem resident; the interview process; conference and alumni tracking; and resident evaluations. The registration fee is $150 and includes handout materials, continental breakfasts, and lunch. To register, contact Marie Wegeman, 504-387-7870 or fax at 504-387-7872.

Avoiding Legal Pitfalls Related to Residents - Part II
Resident Evaluation / Discipline
Hypothetical Case

You believe that a resident, who entered your program in his second year, misstated information in his employment application, forged a letter of recommendation, and has questionable credentials. You discovered this inadvertently when you were reviewing his personnel file and discovered an earlier application, which had distinctly different information in it. In addition to the misstatements in his application, he has also engaged in misconduct in his program which has placed patients at risk.

  1. How should you document these findings in the resident's personnel file ? Does a resident have complete access to his file ? Should you maintain a separate "secret" file for material that you prefer the resident not see ?
  2. What kind of due process hearing, if any, must you provide to the resident prior to disciplining or dismissing him from the program?
Documentation / Discipline / Due Process
  1. Good documentation needs to be kept on each resident. If all the performance evaluations appear in the "satisfactory" range ( informal and undocumented counseling notwithstanding) and if there is no discernable reason in the file for taking disciplinary ction, you will not be able to proceed with that course of action without significant repercussions.

  2. Informal, as well as formal, counseling should be documented. If a resident shows improvement after such counseling, add that to the file at a later date, without making promises that records of informal counseling will be "removed" from the file.

  3. When creating documentation, be factual and avoid expressing opinions. Do not "think" something "may be" wrong. Note specific deficiencies and document examples. Informal and critical comments can result in defamation claims. Be clear, factual and truthful in all written and verbal statements to others and within the file.

  4. If the resident was advised of deficiencies on an informal basis, be sure to let the resident tell his/her side of the story, and document that you provided the opportunity. Later claims of failure of due process can be averted by allowing the resident to do some of the talking, and document that fact.

  5. If you contemplate imposing discipline, impose only discipline that is permitted under the rules of your program and/or University. "Informal" discipline that has sanctions attached, or conditions that could result in sanctions, should be avoided. It is not inappropriate to write a letter informing the resident of deficiencies and warning that, if they are not corrected, formal action will be taken. However, the letter informing the resident of any deficiencies should not contain too many restrictions or mandates. Excessive restrictions or mandates raise due process issues because they leave no avenue for challenging the action.

  6. Be consistent among and between residents. If other residents are not treated similarly for similar infractions or deficient performance, claims of discrimination, as well as defamation, may arise.

File Maintenance and Retention

  1. Files should be kept uniformly. There should be no "duplicate" or "secret" files that do not mirror the official personnel file. Duplicate files kept for the convenience of the department or program director are permissible; however, they are also discoverable in litigation, and should contain no superfluous or gratuitous information. Evaluations, applications, references, or any other information related to employment must be retained.

  2. Residents are permitted to see the contents of their per sonnel files. The exceptions to this rule are items that the residents have waived their right to review (such as letters of recommendation. etc.) and items that the program and/or University has promised others would not be shown to the resident. This information should be kept in the personnel file in such a way that it is separate from the rest of the file and easily removed if the resident requests to review their file. Any communications with the p rogram / University counsel should be kept in a separate place, either in the residency director s office or the personnel file, but in a manner that it is easily removable if a request to review the file is made by either the resident or a third party. The communications should be clearly marked "Attorney-Client Privileged Communications."

  3. Unless there is a good reason to keep information that came to the program / University prior to the hire, information that was received prior to the resident s employment may be discarded or destroyed.

  4. Records generally must be maintained for a set period of time. The files should be cared for and archived under procedures set forth by the program /University.
    1. These records are employment records. The contents ther efore may be confidential and not subject to disclosure without following program / University r ules. Providing information that is contained in personnel files is the same as providing the files themselves. If residents are classified as "students" at your institution, you should be aware of the provisions that the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 makes for disclosures of information and retention of documents.

    2. A lthough these records may be considered pu blic records for some public institutions, some Boards of Regents have determined that there is a strong public interest in maintaining the integrity of the records and privacy of individuals who work at the University. Therefore, unless the rules regarding disclosure are followed, disclosure of information may expose the University to liability for damages for invasion of privacy, constitutional violations, defamation, interference with contractual relationships, or intentional infliction of emotional distress.
  5. Keep documentation related to disciplinary issues on a separate "backer" in the personnel file, so that, in the event disciplinary action must be taken, it can be reviewed easily for sufficiency.

    Adapted from a lecture by Vicki Gotkin, Esq., University of Arizona Health Science Center

    Core Content Task Force Update

    The Core Content Task Force has concluded its work with a report distributed in March. The recommendations are printed below. The full report is availabe upon request from the CORD office. The members of each of the parent organizations should review the work to date and send comments to their respective boards. If the patent organizations approve Task Force #2 would continue on toward the development of a revised Core Content based upon a practice analysis. Despite formidable political differences with some other members of the Task Force, the CORD Board is eager to move forward with Task Force #2. Please send your comments to the CORD office at 517-485-5484 or Sam Keim, MD at or Carey Chisholm, MD at .

    Task Force #1 Recommendations:

    1. Core Content Task Force #2 should be formed and charged with developing a new Core Content for Emergency Medicine based upon a practice analysis of the practice of Emergency Medicine, with input from the parent organizations.

      There should be some continuity from Task Force #1 to Task Force #2 as it will be difficult to pass along the full sense of the work of the first task force. Each organization should decide who its representatives to Task Force #2 will be. Any individuals who are new to the process should be oriented to the project prior to the first meeting of Task Force #2.

    2. An expert consultant should be hired to work with Task Force #2 in performing and analyzing the practice analysis. It is estimated that the project will cost $70,000 - $125,000, and that will take 12-18 months to complete.
    3. The proposed process for conducting the practice analysis and creating a new Core Content has been outlined. Task Force #2 should work with the consultant to perform the following tasks:
      • Develop sample and content parameters for conducting the practice analysis.
      • Analyze the results of the practice analysis and determine how the results should be used to create the new Core Content document.
    4. Task Force #2 should also address the following issues:
      • Recommend a process for conducting future revisions of the Core Content to include answers to the following: When should the next practice analysis be performed? How should revisions of the Core Content be addressed between practice analyses? How frequently should these take place? Who should participate? What parameters, other than those derived from the practice analysis, should be used in determining the appropriateness of future proposed revistions?
      • Determine the appropriate role of EMRA and the RRC-EM in the practice analysis portion of the project.
      • Make recommendations regarding the ongoing role of the RRC-EM in future revisions of the Core Content.
    5. The role of the parent organizations in the development of the New Core Content should include the following:
      • Determine their organization's needs relative to the Core Content and assure that their representatives on the task force are aware of these needs.
      • Review and approve the recommendations of the Task Force at each step in the process.
      • Provide financial support for the activitites of the task force (this should be negotiated by the organizational leadership) respectful of the resources of and the benefit to each organization.

      Carey Chisholm, MD
      Indiana University - Methodist

      Sam Keim, MD
      University of Arizona

      New Chief Resident Forum to Precede Annual Meeting

      On Saturday, May 16 in the Superior Room of the Sheraton Hotel, the inaugural Chief Residents Forum will be co-sponsored by SAEM, CORD, and EMRA. This Forum was developed to assist newly appointed Chief Residents in meeting the demands and responsibilities during the upcoming academic year. Historically, few Chief Residents have had any prior exposure to skill sets vital to the performance of their job. Many indicated that such skills developed through a period of trial and error, which unfortunately added to the stress of the position and diminished effectiveness. It is also anticipated that enrollment in the newly developed Chief Resident list server will occur, along with the opportunity to begin peer networking for future problem solving. The planning committee for the Chief Residents Forum is Rita Cydulka and Steve Dronen (SAEM), Carey Chisholm and Steve Hayden (CORD), and Cherri Hobgood and Henry Souto (EMRA).

      Registration is limited to 200 participants and the registration fee is only $90, which will cover the costs of breakfast, lunch, and audiovisual equipment. Over 100 chief residents have already registered. Contact the CORD office or complete the SAEM Annual Meeting registration form to register your chief residents.

      The schedule of events is as follows and a special thanks is due to all the faculty members who have donated their time and energy to make this Forum a success:

      7:30 - 8:00 am Registration and Continental Breakfast
      8:00 - 8:05 am Welcome & Overview
      8:05 - 8:30 am Optimizing Your CR Experience, Pam Dyne, MD, Olive View-UCLA
      8:30 - 9:00 am RBC-EM: How a Residency Works: Debra Perina, MD, University of Virginia
      9:00 - 9:30 am Transitioning to a Leadership Role, Kevin Rodgers, MD, Brooke Army Medical Center
      9:30 - 9:45 amBreak
      9:45-10:30 am Staying Organized/Time Management Skills: Carey Chisholm, MD, Indiana University-Methodist
      10:30 - 11:30 am The Resident in Crisis/Recognizing Impairment/Confidentiality, Bob McNamara, MD, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences
      11:30 - 1:00 pm Lunch
      1:30 - 1:45 pmScheduling & Back-up Systems: Rita Cydulka, MD, MetroHealth Medical Center
      1:45 - 2:30 pm Middle Management Techniques for the CR: Bob Knopp, MD, Regions Medical Center
      2:30 - 2:45 pm Break
      2:45 - 3:30 pm Teaching Skills for the CR: Steve Hayden, MD, University of California, San Diego
      3:30 - 4:00 pmDealing Ethically with the Biomedical Industry: Sam Keim, MD, University of Arizona
      4:00 - 4:30 pm Developing Academic/Research Skills: Steve Dronen, MD, University of Michigan
      4:30 - 5:30 pm Panel Discussion: Beyond the Macy Conference: Emergency Medicine in the 21st Century:
      Glenn Hamilton, MD, Wright State University
      Louis Ling, MD, Hennepin County Medical Center
      Peter Rosen, MD, University of California, San Diego